3 Idiots may be breaking box office records by the day but that hasn't kept the film and its makers far from controversy. A few days after the release of one of the best films of 2009, popular author Chetan Bhagat (on whose best-selling novel 5 Point Someone the film is based) and Vidhu Vinod Chopra have engaged in a war of words.

Chetan is apparently upset at the way the makers of 3 Idiots have been trying to keep him and his book away from the limelight. Anyone who has read 5 Point Someone and watched 3 Idiots will surely be able to identify the many direct similarities between the two. Yet the makers have been going around town saying their film is completely different from the book.

In fact, early this week at a press conference in Bangalore, Vidhu Vinod Chopra accused Chetan of seeking unnecessary publicity. Needless to say, the best-selling writer has not taken this remark too lightly.

Chetan has come out in the open and spoken about this issue in his official blog and here are excerpts of the same:

The 3 Idiots story credit issue has been making some noise now. The news is coming out in bits and pieces, and I think it is important I clarify a few things. Yes, clearly, the makers of the film have been unfair and thousands of my readers have been saying so. I am aware of this, and this is not an issue that has 'just come up'. I've been grappling with it for two years, but kept silent about it.

The only reason it has surfaced after the movie's release is because Five Point Someone has a few million readers, and when you copy a popular story claiming it as 'original' and 'completely different', people are going to find out. People did, and so did a lot of media journalists. Pre-release, the makers made press statements like the movie is only 'very loosely', '2%-5% inspired by the book'.

After release, those who have read the book and seen the movie (and frankly, I think those are the only people who have the right to comment) find the film to be an adaptation of Five Point Someone (FPS). The setting, characters, plotline, dramatic twists and turns, one-liners, theme, message -- almost all aspects that make up the story are from FPS. Yes, there are some changes, any adaptation requires that -- but it is in no way an original story.

Leading movie critics have privately admitted to me that the film is 70% the book. Still, don't take my word for it; go read the book, watch the film. I, frankly, was shocked to see this. This is because I was also fed 'this is an original movie' line a lot. I wanted to see the final script -- it was never shown to me. I wanted to see the film before release -- it was not shown to me (even though trials had been done for people).

What's more, the makers had called me to their office and pressurized me several times to withdraw my 'Based on a novel by' credit, which was by contract. They told me they'd replace it with something like 'initiated by' -- a credit that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. I still told them that if the film is indeed original, I'll happily withdraw the credit, but somehow the promos don't tell me so. I asked them to show me the film and they fell silent.

Ten days before the release, I was called into their office. They said 'we should be friends now'. I said I am always up for friendship, and the success of the film is good for me as well. They also said, and I quote verbatim 'even though this is an original film, we have given you a great credit, right upfront. After all, we love writers and a king should treat another king with respect. You are family.' I believed them. Then I went for the premiere. My family sat in the theatre shocked, as sequence after sequence came from the book. 2%-5% means 3-6 minutes, and I had told my family to look for the few FPS moments and note them.

However, there were so many that it became impossible to keep track. The plot line was same -- people meet at ragging, the first class with definition of machine, the friends separate, Alok (Raju) moves with Venkat (Chatur), Ryan (Rancho) helps Alok's father, Alok rejoins group etc. etc. From Alok (Raju) jumping to stealing the papers and calling out from Cherian (Virus') office -- the book came alive on screen. I was surprised and happy that FPS has made it in such a grand way. However, my family had not spotted my credit in the beginning (there was none) and they were feeling let down.

A screenplay associate credit to VVC had a prominent upfront placement. The story credit was not shared with me. And yes, all the office talk of a 'king treated like king' was a white lie. I knew they had played with me, and that 'based on a novel by' credit, which they were legally bound to give would be hushed away at the end -- with the clear intention of making sure people miss it. And indeed, it came after the junior artists and still photographer of the movie, and zoomed away fast. My own mother missed seeing my name, and for that she cried after seeing the film. I told her it doesn't matter, as people know FPS. But yes, that hurt me a lot. I went up to the makers after the premiere, and they said 'it is a hit so chill and forget about it.' I guess I could, but it is hard.

Only a writer or creative person knows how this feels. I am one of the lucky ones that people have read FPS. Imagine the fate of other writers in Bollywood. Anyway, I came home and thanked God for making my story reach so many people. Upon the film's release -- my mailbox and Twitter account literally became flooded. Fans and readers wrote stunned mails. They had seen the makers' interviews which had denied FPS links and they missed seeing the credit on screen. I kept quiet, though I did send a message to the makers telling them audience reactions. They did not respond.

Soon media journalists saw the film. They called me and said they have to do a story on this as they are on my side. I tried my best to avoid them. However, when one journalist from Delhi called, and asked me how I felt about the credit. I used one word; I said 'strange'. And that's when the news exploded. This, my friends, is the story. Meanwhile, the makers have accused me of seeking fame -- when clearly, it is the other way round. They've taken my story to make fame for themselves, and shut me out of it. I know my readers will spot it immediately.

However, the film also reaches millions of other people who do not read books and they deserve to know who wrote the story. And that is why I am talking about this issue (and I admit for people who've read the book, they may wonder it's so obvious so why I am going on about it). Some people have told me that I should keep silent. I did try to be silent but didn't work. Also, people say this is how Bollywood works. Sorry, I disagree. Not all Bollywood works like this. There are a lot of good people too. And every event like this helps change things for the better. And that is what I am all about anyway. I urge you to not believe me at face value. Read the book, see the movie -- and like the movie says -- think for yourself and decide."

Whatever be the outcome of this clash, one thing is certain. Aal Izz certainly not Well between Chetan Bhagat and the makers of 3 Idiots.

Courtesy: Bollywood Hungama